Shader API more consistent naming

Summary:
Renamed shaders to be prefixed with Hard/Soft depending on if they use a probabalistic blending (Soft) or use the closest face (Hard).

There is some code duplication but I thought it would be cleaner to have separate shaders for each task rather than:
- inheritance (which we discussed previously that we want to avoid)
- boolean (hard/soft) or a string (hard/soft) - new blending functions other than the ones provided would need if statements in the current shaders which might get messy.

Also added a `flat_shading` function and a `FlatShader` - I could make this into a tutorial as it was really easy to add a new shader and it might be a nice showcase.

NOTE: There are a few more places where the naming will need to change (e.g the tutorials) but I wanted to reach a consensus on this before changing it everywhere.

Reviewed By: jcjohnson

Differential Revision: D19761036

fbshipit-source-id: f972f6530c7f66dc5550b0284c191abc4a7f6fc4

.gitignore

@@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ build/
 dist/
 *.egg-info/
 **/__pycache__/
+*-checkpoint.ipynb
+**/.ipynb_checkpoints
+**/.ipynb_checkpoints/**
+
 
 # Docusaurus site
 website/yarn.lock